Skip to main content
Book Chapter

Academic Subjectivity, Idols, and the Vicissitudes of Virtues in Science: Epistemic Modesty Versus Epistemic Grandiosity

  • Teo T
Springer International Publishing, (2019), 31-48
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-25308-0_2
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The subjectivity of the researcher is as much embedded in society, history, and the larger culture as any other subjectivity. Political-economic conditions, the Zeitgeist, social characteristics, the academic habitus, personal idiosyncrasies, institutional realities,...

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Teo, T. (2019). Academic Subjectivity, Idols, and the Vicissitudes of Virtues in Science: Epistemic Modesty Versus Epistemic Grandiosity. In Psychological Studies of Science and Technology (pp. 31–48). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25308-0_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free