The nature of life in the history of medical and philosophic thinking

7Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The vitalistic doctrine of Aristotle and Galen, in which the soul is an indissoluble part of the body, was undisputed throughout most of the Middle Ages. The first radical change came with Telesio, who developed philosophic naturalism in which the soul has a reality of its own, though it is connected to the body. The definitive change came with Descartes, who believed that all biologic phenomena can be explained by the laws of mechanics, and only man is distinguished by the possession of a soul. For the next 300 years, this mechanistic view would be challenged by a new vitalism, in which the ‘vital force’ has an existence in its own right. © 1994 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Federspil, G., & Sicolo, N. (1994). The nature of life in the history of medical and philosophic thinking. American Journal of Nephrology, 14(4–6), 337–343. https://doi.org/10.1159/000168745

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free