A data framework for assessing social inequality and equity in multi-sector social, ecological, infrastructural urban systems: Focus on fine-spatial scales

23Citations
Citations of this article
82Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Cities are increasingly advancing multiple societal goals related to environmental sustainability, health, well-being, and equity. However, there are few comprehensive data sets that address social inequality and equity across multiple infrastructure sectors, determinants, and outcomes, particularly at fine intra-urban spatial scales. This paper: (1) Offers an overarching conceptualization of inequality and equity in multi-sector urban systems; (2) Introduces a broad data framework to assess inequality and equity across social (S), ecological (E), infrastructural (I), and urban (U) form determinants (SEIU) and environment (E), health (H), well-being (W), and economy and security (E) outcomes (EHWE), identifying a universe of >110 SEIU–EHWE data layers (variables) of interest; (3) Provides an illustrative data case study of a US city that synthesizes publicly available sources of the associated SEIU–EHWE data attributes, noting their availability/gaps at fine spatial scales, important to inform social inequality; (4) Discusses analytic methods to quantify inequality and spatial correlates across SEIU determinants and EHWE outcomes; and, (5) Demonstrates several use-cases of the data framework and companion analytic methods through real-world applied case studies that inform equity planning in applications ranging from energy sector investments to air pollution and health. The US data case study reveals data availability (covering 41 of the 113 data layers) as well as major gaps associated with EHWE outcomes at fine spatial scales, while the application examples demonstrate practical use. Overall, the SEIU–EHWE data framework provides an anchor for systematically gathering, analyzing, and informing multiple dimensions of inequality and equity in sustainable urban systems.

References Powered by Scopus

A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

9560Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Social vulnerability to environmental hazards

3979Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design

3077Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

National and Intraurban Air Pollution Exposure Disparity Estimates in the United States: Impact of Data-Aggregation Spatial Scale

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Air pollution exposure and cardiometabolic risk

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Who Gardens and How in Urban USA: Informing Social Equity in Urban Agriculture Action Plans

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Clark, L. P., Tabory, S., Tong, K., Servadio, J. L., Kappler, K., Xu, C. K., … Ramaswami, A. (2022). A data framework for assessing social inequality and equity in multi-sector social, ecological, infrastructural urban systems: Focus on fine-spatial scales. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 26(1), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13222

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

58%

Researcher 8

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 12

52%

Environmental Science 6

26%

Computer Science 3

13%

Energy 2

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free