Elective amniocentesis in low-risk pregnancies: Decision making in the era of information and uncertainty

14Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives. Rational choice theory was applied to explain women's use of amniocentesis. Variables included knowledge about prenatal diagnostics, attitudes, and emotional preferences. Methods. Using structured instruments at 9 to 14 and at 29 to 34 weeks' gestation, we interviewed 232 Israeli women who had low-risk pregnancies. Results. Women who had elective amniocentesis (n=39) were more knowledgeable about prenatal diagnostics, risks of invasive procedures, and probability of fetal abnormality in high maternal age; had fewer children; and had less favorable attitudes toward parenthood than those who had medically indicated amniocentesis (n=57) and those who did not have amniocentesis (n=136). Conclusions. The use and possible overuse of amniocentesis were associated with having more information about prenatal diagnostics and definite emotional preferences.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lesser, Y., & Rabinowitz, J. (2001). Elective amniocentesis in low-risk pregnancies: Decision making in the era of information and uncertainty. American Journal of Public Health, 91(4), 639–641. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.91.4.639

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free