Punishibility of Artificial Intelligence Technology

  • Hallevy G
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In determining the type and measure of punishment to be imposed on the offender, the court is guided by the general purposes of punishment. The court is expected to assess and evaluate each case in this context, based on two types of considerations: data about the offense (in rem) and the about the offender (in personam). When the court evaluates these two types of data, it does so through the prism of the general purposes of punishment. In the modern criminal law there are four accepted general purposes of punishment. The four purposes are retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, and incapacitation. These purposes are discussed below.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hallevy, G. (2015). Punishibility of Artificial Intelligence Technology. In Liability for Crimes Involving Artificial Intelligence Systems (pp. 185–227). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10124-8_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free