Patch test results with the European baseline series, 2019/20—Joint European results of the ESSCA and the EBS working groups of the ESCD, and the GEIDAC

49Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Continual analyses of patch test results with the European baseline series (EBS) serve both contact allergy surveillance and auditing the value of included allergens. Objectives: To present results of current EBS patch testing, obtained in 53 departments in 13 European countries during 2019 and 2020. Methods: Anonymised or pseudonymised individual data and partly aggregated data on demographic/clinical characteristics and patch test rest results with the EBS were prospectively collected and centrally pooled and analysed. Results: In 2019 and 2020, 22 581 patients were patch tested with the EBS. Sensitization to nickel remained most common (19.8 [19.2–20.4]% positivity [95% confidence interval]). Fragrance mix I and Myroxylon pereirae yielded very similar results with 6.80 (6.43–7.19)% and 6.62 (6.25–7.00)% positivity, respectively. Formaldehyde at 2% aq. yielded almost one percentage point more positive reactions than 1% concentration (2.49 [2.16–2.85]% vs. 1.59 [1.33–1.88]); methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI) and MI alone up to around 5% positives. Among the new additions, propolis was most commonly positive (3.48 [3.16–3.82]%), followed by 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2.32 [2.0–2.68]%). Conclusion: Ongoing surveillance on the prevalence of contact sensitization contributes to an up-to-date baseline series containing the most frequent and/or relevant contact sensitizers for routine patch testing in Europe.

References Powered by Scopus

European Society of Contact Dermatitis guideline for diagnostic patch testing - Recommendations on best practice

1112Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

National rates and regional differences in sensitization to allergens of the standard series. Population-adjusted frequencies of sensitization (PAFS) in 40,000 patients from a multicenter study (IVDK)

374Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Thoughts on sensitizers in a standard patch test series

217Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The European baseline series and recommended additions: 2023

37Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

2-Hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA): A clinical review of contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis—Part 1. Introduction, epidemiology, case series and case reports

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

2-Hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA): A clinical review of contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis. Part 2. Cross- and co-sensitization, other skin reactions to HEMA, position of HEMA among (meth)acrylates, sensitivity as screening agent, presence of HEMA in commercial products and practical information on patch test procedures

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Uter, W., Wilkinson, S. M., Aerts, O., Bauer, A., Borrego, L., Brans, R., … Gonçalo, M. (2022). Patch test results with the European baseline series, 2019/20—Joint European results of the ESSCA and the EBS working groups of the ESCD, and the GEIDAC. Contact Dermatitis, 87(4), 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.14170

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

56%

Researcher 4

44%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 8

67%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

17%

Computer Science 1

8%

Neuroscience 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free