A Product Pain-Pleasure Framework for Software Product Design in the Usability and User Experience Domains

7Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study utilized a literature review strategy to examine prior literature pertaining to the frameworks concerning how to minimize users‘ pain and maximize their pleasure while interacting with the designs of interactive products. The findings of the study reveal that several such frameworks are in existence and are mainly in other domains different from usability and user experience. In these, the emphasis were mostly on satisfaction and dissatisfaction criteria which do not cover the broader perspectives of user experience that comprise hedonic, affective, aesthetics and other hedonomic facets. This prompts for the development of a framework that tailored to usability and user experience concerns to enable user experience designers design interactive products that will enhance users‘ experience. The proposed framework was adapted from previous related frameworks It is a three-factor framework that is composed of pain factors, linear factors and pleasure factors. The study proposes this framework to facilitate the design of interactive systems that improves the experience of users.

References Powered by Scopus

4201Citations
3931Readers
Get full text

This article is free to access.

1191Citations
1195Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A UX 3-Factor Hierarchical Model for Understanding, Designing and Evaluating the UX of Software Products

7Citations
14Readers
Get full text

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hashim, W., Mkpojiogu, E. O. C., Hussain, A., & Abdul-Aziz, S. N. (2021). A Product Pain-Pleasure Framework for Software Product Design in the Usability and User Experience Domains. Webology, 18, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.14704/WEB/V18SI01/WEB18004

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘2405101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

59%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

12%

Researcher 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 8

57%

Design 3

21%

Psychology 2

14%

Sports and Recreations 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0