Reliability of long vs short COI markers in identification of forensically important flies

22Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: To compare the reliability of short and long cytochrome oxidase I gene fragment (COI) in identification of forensically important Diptera from Egypt and China. Methods: We analyzed 50 specimens belonging to 18 species. The two investigated markers were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by direct sequencing. Nucleotide sequence divergences were calculated using the Kimura two-parameter (K2P) distance model and neighbor-joining (NJ) phylogenetic trees. Results: Although both tested fragments showed an overlap between intra and interspecific variations, long marker had greater completeness of monophyletic separation with high bootstrap support. Moreover, NJ tree based on the long fragment clustered species more in accordance with their taxonomic classification than that based on the short fragment. Conclusion: In dipterous identification, it is recommended to use the long COI marker due to its greater reliability and safety.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aly, S. M. (2014). Reliability of long vs short COI markers in identification of forensically important flies. Croatian Medical Journal, 55(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2014.55.19

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free