The politics of strategic environmental assessment indicators: Weak recognition found in Chinese guidelines

16Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The choice and use of indicators is not only technical and science-led, but also a value-laden social process, and thus concerns public participation and political judgement. This article approaches the Chinese strategic environmental assessment (SEA) indicator system from a science-policy interface perspective and aims to: (1) contribute to the general recognition of indicators functioning in SEA; and (2) analyse, through a Chinese case study, to what extent national guidelines address this science-policy interaction. The overall finding is a strong emphasis on technical/science aspects in the Chinese SEA guidance, and a weak explicit recognition that policy plays a role in choosing and using indicators. Recent development, however, indicates a growing recognition of the politics involved and thus also leads to greater involvement of stakeholders. © 2013 Copyright IAIA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gao, J., Kørnøv, L., & Christensen, P. (2013). The politics of strategic environmental assessment indicators: Weak recognition found in Chinese guidelines. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 31(3), 232–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2013.786925

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free