Are Mojave Desert annual species equal? Resource acquisition and allocation for the invasive grass Bromus madritensis subsp. rubens (Poaceae) and two native species

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Abundance of invasive plants is often attributed to their ability ot outcompete native species. We compared resource acquisition and allocation of the invasive annual grass Bromus madritensis subsp. rubens with that of two native Mojave Desert annuals, Vulpia octoflora and Descurainia pinnata, in a glasshouse experiment. Each species was grown in monoculture at two densities and two levels of N availability to compare how these annuals capture resources and to understand their relative sensitivities to environmental change. During >4 mo of growth, Bromus used water more rapidly and had greater biomass and N content than the natives, partly because of its greater root-surface area and its exploitation of deep soils. Bromus also had greater N uptake, net assimilation and transpiration rates, and canopy area than Vulpia. Resource use by Bromus was less sensitive to changes in N availability or density than were the natives. The two native species in this study produced numerous small seeds that tended to remain dormant, thus ensuring escape of offspring from unfavorable germination conditions; Bromus produced fewer but larger seeds that readily germinated. Collectively, these traits give Bromus the potential to rapidly establish in diverse habitats of the Mojave Desert, thereby gaining an advantage over coexisting native species.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

DeFalco, L. A., Bryla, D. R., Smith-Longozo, V., & Nowak, R. S. (2003). Are Mojave Desert annual species equal? Resource acquisition and allocation for the invasive grass Bromus madritensis subsp. rubens (Poaceae) and two native species. American Journal of Botany, 90(7), 1045–1053. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.90.7.1045

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 29

58%

Researcher 11

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38

63%

Environmental Science 18

30%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 3

5%

Neuroscience 1

2%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free