Discriminating rigid from nonrigid motion: Minimum points and views

52Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Theoretical investigations of structure from motion have demonstrated that an ideal observer can discriminate rigid from nonrigid motion from two views of as few as four points. We report three experiments that demonstrate similar abilities in human observers: In one experiment, 4 of 6 subjects made this discrimination from two views of four points; the remaining subjects required five points. Accuracy in discriminating rigid from nonrigid motion depended on the amount of nonrigidity (variance ofthe interpoint distances overviews) in the nonrigid structure. The ability to detect a rigid group dropped sharply as noise points (points not part of the rigid group) were added to the display. We conclude that human observers do extremely well in discriminating between nonrigid and fully rigid motion, but that they do quite poorly at segregating points in a display on the basis of rigidity. © 1990 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Braunstein, M. L., Hoffman, D. D., & Pollick, F. E. (1990). Discriminating rigid from nonrigid motion: Minimum points and views. Perception & Psychophysics, 47(3), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204996

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free