Leg lengthening over an intramedullary nail

129Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Distraction osteogenesis is widely used for leg lengthening, but often requires a long period of external fixation which carries risks of pin-track sepsis, malalignment, stiffness of the joint and late fracture of the regenerate. We present the results of 20 cases in which, in an attempt to reduce the rate of complications, a combination of external fixation and intramedullary nailing was used. The mean gain in length was 4.7 cm (2 to 8.6). The mean time of external fixation was 20 days per centimetre gain in length. All distracted segments healed spontaneously without refracture or malalignment. There were three cases of deep infection, two of which occurred in patients who had had previous open fractures of the bone which was being lengthened. All resolved with appropriate treatment. This method allows early rehabilitation, with a rapid return of knee movement. There is a lower rate of complications than occurs when external fixation is used on its own. The time of external fixation is shorter than in other methods of leg lengthening. The high risk of infection calls for caution.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Simpson, A. H. R. W., Cole, A. S., & Kenwright, J. (1999). Leg lengthening over an intramedullary nail. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B, 81(6), 1041–1045. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.81B6.9359

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free