Constraint propagation in kimmo systems

2Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Taken abstractly, the two-level (Kimmo) morphological framework allows computationally difficult problems to arise. For example, N + 1 small automata are sufficient to encode the Boolean satisfiability problem (SAT) for formulas in N variables. However, the suspicion arises that natural-language problems may have a special structure - not shared with SAT - that is not directly captured in the two-level model. In particular, the natural problems may generally have a modular and local nature that distinguishes them from more "global" SAT problems. By exploiting this structure, it may be possible to solve the natural problems by methods that do not involve combinatorial search. We have explored this possibility in a preliminary way by applying constraint propagation methods to Kimmo generation and recognition. Constraint propagation can succeed when the solution falls into place step-by-step through a chain of limited and local inferences, but it is insufficiently powerful to solve unnaturally hard SAT problems. Limited tests indicate that the constraint-propagation algorithm for Kimmo generation works for English, Turkish, and Warlpiri. When applied to a Kimmo system that encodes SAT problems, the algorithm succeeds on "easy" SAT problems but fails (as desired) on "hard" problems.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Computational structure of GPSG models

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barton, G. E. (1986). Constraint propagation in kimmo systems. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Vol. 1986-July, pp. 45–52). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.3115/981131.981139

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 19

61%

Researcher 6

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 26

76%

Linguistics 5

15%

Social Sciences 2

6%

Neuroscience 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free