The application of artificial roughness to mitigate tip vortex cavitation inception is analyzed through numerical and experimental investigations carried out on an elliptical foil. Different roughness configurations and sizes are tested, and effects on cavitation inception, drag, and lift are studied. Implicit Large Eddy Simulation is employed to conduct the simulation on a proper grid resolution having the tip vortex spatial resolution as fine as 0.062 mm. Two different approaches including using a rough wall function and resolving the flow around roughness elements are evaluated. New experiments, performed in the cavitation tunnel at Kongsberg Hydrodynamic Research Center, for the rough foil are presented. The vortical structures and vorticity magnitude distributions are employed to demonstrate how different roughness patterns and configurations contribute to the vortex roll-up and consequently on the tip vortex strength. It is found that the application of roughness on the leading edge, tip region, and trailing edge of the suction side is acceptable to mitigate the tip vortex and also to limit the performance degradation. This is regarded to be in close relation with the way that the tip vortex forms in the studied operating condition. The boundary layer characteristics show that roughness separation line is the reason for a more even distribution of vorticity over the tip compared to the smooth foil condition, leading to a reduction in vortex strength. For the optimum roughness pattern, both the numerical results and experimental measurements show a decrease in the tip vortex cavitation inception as large as 33% compared to the smooth foil condition with a drag force increase observed to be less than 2%.
CITATION STYLE
Asnaghi, A., Svennberg, U., Gustafsson, R., & Bensow, R. E. (2020). Investigations of tip vortex mitigation by using roughness. Physics of Fluids, 32(6). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0009622
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.