Testing the morphogenesist model of primary state formation: The zapotec case

17Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this chapter, I take a macroevolutionary approach to primary state formation by conducting an empirical test of the morphogenesist model, the key postulates of which are that (1) chiefdoms and states are based on fundamentally different principles of administrative structure and optimal regulatory strategies and (2) the transition from chiefdom to primary state is an emergent, transformational process and not simply the result of continuous, incremental adaptation. I draw an analogy between this model of cultural transformation and the adaptive landscape approach to macroevolution pioneered by Sewall Wright in his shifting balance theory and further developed by George G. Simpson in his theory of quantum evolution. A key expectation of both approaches is that the system undergoing such a major evolutionary transformation for the first time must traverse a valley of relatively low adaptedness as it moves from a long-standing peak to a newly emergent peak on the adaptive landscape. I assess this expectation with data on the emergence of the Monte Albán state ca. 300 B.C. in Mexico's Oaxaca Valley. © 2009 Springer-Verlag New York.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Spencer, C. S. (2009). Testing the morphogenesist model of primary state formation: The zapotec case. In Macroevolution in Human Prehistory: Evolutionary Theory and Processual Archaeology (pp. 133–155). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0682-3_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free