Comparison of fresh, ethanol‐preserved, and paraffin‐embedded samples in DNA flow cytometry

57Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Fresh, ethanol‐preserved, and formalinfixed and paraffin‐embedded samples taken from the same part of 15 human tumors, and from one normal spleen and one pancreas were analyzed for nuclear DNA content by flow cytometry. The coefficient of variation (CV) values of the Gl peaks were smaller in the fresh than in the other samples (P < 0.001). The DNA ploidy of the tumors was the same in all types of samples. The DNA indices (DIs) measured from either ethanol‐preserved or formalin‐fixed tissue correlated strongly with those obtained from fresh tissue (P < 0.001), although they tended to be somewhat smaller in the fresh samples. The S‐phase fractions measured from all types of samples were of the same order of magnitude in most cases (P < 0.001). Uninterpretable histograms were most often obtained from fresh samples. Identical DI values and rather constant S‐phase fractions were obtained from ethanol‐preserved samples stored at 4°C for up to 5 months. It is concluded that all three types of samples are suitable for the determination of DNA ploidy, DI, and S‐phase fraction and that 50% ethanol is suitable for long‐term preservation of flow cytometric samples. Copyright © 1989 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alanen, K. A., Klemi, P. J., Joensuu, H., Kujari, H., & Pekkala, E. (1989). Comparison of fresh, ethanol‐preserved, and paraffin‐embedded samples in DNA flow cytometry. Cytometry, 10(1), 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.990100114

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free