The challenges and approaches of measuring research impact and influence on public policy making

2Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: Measuring research’s policy influence is challenging, given the complexity of the policy process, the gradual nature of policy influence, and the time lag between research investment and impact. This paper assesses measurement approaches and discusses their merits and applications to overcome various hurdles. Design/methodology/approach: Relevant articles and studies were selected and analyzed. First, the research-policy interface was revisited to understand their link and how research influences policy making. Second, the most common approaches for measuring policy influence were reviewed based on their features, strengths, and limitations. Findings: The three approaches reviewed — pyramid, influencing, and results chain — have their respective strengths. Thus, research organizations planning to design a program for monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of policy influence have to adopt the best possible features of each approach and develop a customized method depending on their objectives and overall M&E framework. Originality/value: This paper fosters a deeper understanding of leveraging the three approaches.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Siar, S. (2023). The challenges and approaches of measuring research impact and influence on public policy making. Public Administration and Policy, 26(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAP-05-2022-0046

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free