Independent population coding of speech with sub-millisecond precision

25Citations
Citations of this article
79Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To understand the strategies used by the brain to analyze complex environments, we must first characterize how the features of sensory stimuli are encoded in the spiking of neuronal populations. Characterizing a population code requires identifying the temporal precision of spiking and the extent to which spiking is correlated, both between cells and over time. In this study, we characterize the population code for speech in the gerbil inferior colliculus (IC), the hub of the auditory system where inputs from parallel brainstem pathways are integrated for transmission to the cortex.Wefind that IC spike trains can carry information about speech with sub-millisecond precision, and, consequently, that the temporal correlations imposed by refractoriness can play a significant role in shaping spike patterns.Wealso find that, in contrast to most other brain areas, the noise correlations between IC cells are extremely weak, indicating that spiking in the population is conditionally independent. These results demonstrate that the problem of understanding the population coding of speech can be reduced to the problem of understanding the stimulus-driven spiking of individual cells, suggesting that a comprehensive model of the subcortical processing of speech may be attainable in the near future. © 2013 the authors.

References Powered by Scopus

1213Citations
744Readers

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

Get full text
105Citations
268Readers

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Garcia-Lazaro, J. A., Belliveau, L. A. C., & Lesica, N. A. (2013). Independent population coding of speech with sub-millisecond precision. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(49), 19362–19372. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3711-13.2013

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2405101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 34

54%

Researcher 16

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Neuroscience 24

40%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24

40%

Engineering 7

12%

Medicine and Dentistry 5

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0