Reconstruction as a long-term process. Memory, experiences and cultural heritage in the irpinia post-earthquake (November 23, 1980)

5Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Reconstruction after an earthquake is often seen as a material issue, which concerns “objects” such as houses, roofs, and streets. This point of view is supported by the mass media showing the work progress in the disaster areas, especially in conjunction with anniversaries. Rather, we should consider reconstruction as a complex social process in which cultural backgrounds, expectations, and ideas of the future come into play, without neglecting geological, historical, legislative, economic, and political factors. Combining oral history sources and archival records, the article shows the paths taken by two small towns among the most affected by the earthquake of 23rd November 1980 (Mw 6.9). These towns have made opposite reconstruction choices (in situ and ex novo) representing two classical and different ways in which human societies can face their past and think their own future. A careful analysis of these forty-year experiences, with a special focus on cultural heritage, provides useful indications for post-disaster reconstructions in which more attention to the process, and not just to the final product, should be paid.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moscaritolo, G. I. (2020). Reconstruction as a long-term process. Memory, experiences and cultural heritage in the irpinia post-earthquake (November 23, 1980). Geosciences (Switzerland), 10(8), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10080316

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free