Frame identification as categorization: Exemplars vs prototypes in embeddingland

10Citations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Categorization is a central capability of human cognition, and a number of theories have been developed to account for properties of categorization. Despite the fact that many semantic tasks involve categorization, theories of categorization do not play a major role in contemporary research in computational linguistics. This paper follows the idea that embedding-based models of semantics lend themselves well to being formulated in terms of classical categorization theories. The benefit is a group of models that enables (a) the formulation of hypotheses about the impact of major design decisions, and (b) a transparent assessment of these decisions. We instantiate this idea on the frame-semantic frame identification task. We define four models that cross two design variables: (a) the choice of prototype vs. exemplar categorization, corresponding to different degrees of generalization applied to the input, and (b) the presence vs. absence of a fine-tuning step, corresponding to generic vs. task-adaptive categorization. We find that for frame identification, generalization and task-adaptive categorization both yield substantial benefits. Our prototype-based, fine-tuned model, which combines the best choices over these variables, establishes a new state-of-the-art in frame identification.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sikos, J., & Padó, S. (2019). Frame identification as categorization: Exemplars vs prototypes in embeddingland. In IWCS 2019 - Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computational Semantics - Long Papers (pp. 295–306). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w19-0425

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free