Allograft outcome following repeat transplantation of patients with non-adherence-related first kidney allograft failure: a population cohort study

10Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Nonadherence is an important risk factor for premature allograft failure after kidney transplantation, but outcomes after re-transplantation remain uncertain. Using data from the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant registry, the associations between causes of first allograft failure and acute rejection-related and non-adherence-related allograft failure following re-transplantation were examined using competing risk analyses, treating the respective alternative causes of allograft failure and death with functioning graft as competing events. Fifty-nine of 2450 patients (2%) lost their first allografts from nonadherence. Patients who lost their first kidney allograft from nonadherence were younger at the time of first kidney allograft failure but waited longer for a second allograft (>5 years: 54% vs. 20%, P < 0.001) compared with other causes. Compared with patients who lost their first allograft from causes other than nonadherence, the adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (HR and 95% CI) for acute rejection-related second allograft failure was 0.58 (0.08, 4.07; P = 0.582) for patients with allograft failure attributed to nonadherence and was 6.30 (1.34, 29.67; P = 0.020) for non-adherence-related second allograft failure. In this cohort of transplant recipients who have received second allografts, first allograft failure secondary to nonadherence was associated with a marginally greater risk of allograft failure attributed to nonadherence in subsequent transplantation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Manickavasagar, R., Wong, G., Alexander, S. I., Francis, A., Prestidge, C., Larkins, N. G., … Lim, W. H. (2019). Allograft outcome following repeat transplantation of patients with non-adherence-related first kidney allograft failure: a population cohort study. Transplant International, 32(12), 1247–1258. https://doi.org/10.1111/tri.13492

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free