Unique aspects of clinical trials of invasive therapies for chronic pain

25Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Nearly all who review the literature conclude that the role of invasive procedures to treat chronic pain is poorly characterized because of the lack of "definitive" studies. The overt nature of invasive treatments, along with the risks, technical skills, and costs involved create challenges to study them. However, these challenges do not completely preclude evaluating invasive procedure effectiveness and safety using well-designed methods. This article reviews the challenges of studying outcomes of invasive therapies to treat pain and discuss possible solutions. Although the following discussion can apply to most invasive therapies to treat chronic pain, it is beyond the scope of the article to individually cover every invasive therapy used. Therefore, most of the examples focus on injection therapies to treat spine pain, spinal cord stimulation, and intrathecal drug therapies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cohen, S. P., Wallace, M., Rauck, R. L., & Stacey, B. R. (2019). Unique aspects of clinical trials of invasive therapies for chronic pain. Pain Reports, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000687

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free