Nationalist Exclusion and Ethnic Conflict: Shadows of Modernity

  • Dodds A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
208Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Andreas Wimmer argues that nationalist and ethnic politics have shaped modern societies to a far greater extent than has been acknowledged by social scientists. The modern state governs in the name of a people defined in ethnic and national terms. Democratic participation, equality before the law and protection from arbitrary violence were offered only to the ethnic group in a privileged relationship with the emerging nation-state. Depending on circumstances, the dynamics of exclusion took on different forms. Where nation building was successful , immigrants and ethnic minorities are excluded from full participation; they risk being targets of xenophobia and racism. In weaker states, political closure proceeded along ethnic, rather than national lines and leads to corresponding forms of conflict and violence. In chapters on Mexico, Iraq and Switzerland, Wimmer provides extended case studies that support and contextualise this argument.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dodds, A. (2003). Nationalist Exclusion and Ethnic Conflict: Shadows of Modernity. Contemporary Political Theory, 2(2), 251–253. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300075

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free