Serological grouping of streptococci: A collective evaluation in six laboratories of three rapid methods

1Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Three serological methods for streptococci grouping: latex agglutination after pronase extraction (LAP), latex agglutination after nitrous acid extraction (LAN) and counterimmunoelectrophoresis after nitrous acid extraction (CIEN) were evaluated in six laboratories with 310 strains of streptococci. To reduce the possible influence of a particular laboratory, each serological procedure was performed in two different laboratories with identical protocols and strains. Between the three procedures, a total agreement of 81.3 % with six identical results was obtained. Since only one discordant result was obtained in 12.2 % (CIEN 4.8 % - LAN 5.8 % - LAP 1.6 %) and two discordant results with two different serological methods in 2.6 %, it could be concluded that agreement between the three procedures was 96 %. For B (99 strains tested) and D (100 strains tested) groups, total agreements of respectively 95 % and 92 % were achieved. In conclusion, LAP, LAN, and CIEN gave equivalent results for streptococci grouping, but LAN was the most simple needing no heating, centrifugation, or electrophoresis equipment and lacking cross-reactivity of group C antibody. © 1982 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guinet, R., André, J., Barbé, G., Boude, M., Carret, G., Freydière, A. M., … Mazoyer, M. A. (1982). Serological grouping of streptococci: A collective evaluation in six laboratories of three rapid methods. Medical Microbiology and Immunology, 171(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02122704

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free