The quantification of NOxand SO2point source emission flux errors of mobile differential optical absorption spectroscopy on the basis of the Gaussian dispersion model: A simulation study

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Mobile differential optical absorption spectroscopy (mobile DOAS) has become an important tool for the quantification of emission sources, including point sources (e.g., individual power plants) and area emitters (e.g., entire cities). In this study, we focused on the error budget of mobile DOAS measurements from point sources, and we also offered recommendations for the optimum settings of such measurements via a simulation with a modified Gaussian plume model. Following the analysis, we conclude that (1) the proper sampling resolution should be between 5 and 50 m. (2) When measuring far from the source, undetectable flux (measured slant column densities (SCDs) are under the detection limit) resulting from wind dispersion is the main error source. The threshold for the undetectable flux can be lowered by larger integration time. When measuring close to the source, low sampling frequency results in large errors, and wind field uncertainty becomes the main error source of SO2 flux (for NOx this error also increases, but other error sources dominate). More measurement times can lower the flux error that results from wind field uncertainty. The proper wind speed for mobile DOAS measurements is between 1 and 4 m s-1. (3) The remaining errors by [NOx] = [NO2] ratio correction can be significant when measuring very close. To minimize the [NOx] = [NO2] ratio correction error, we recommend minimum distances from the source, at which 5 % of the NO2 maximum reaction rate is reached and thus NOx steady state can be assumed. (4) Our study suggests that emission rates < 30 g s-1 for NOx and < 50 g s-1 for SO2 are not recommended for mobile DOAS measurements. Based on the model simulations, our study indicates that mobile DOAS measurements are a very well-suited tool to quantify point source emissions. The results of our sensitivity studies are important to make optimum use of such measurements.

References Powered by Scopus

Increase in tropospheric nitrogen dioxide over China observed from space

1216Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measurements of the NO<inf>2</inf> absorption cross-section from 42 000 cm<sup>-1</sup> to 10 000 cm<sup>-1</sup> (238-1000 nm) at 220 K and 294 K

671Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A miniaturised ultraviolet spectrometer for remote sensing of SO<inf>2</inf> fluxes: A new tool for volcano surveillance

337Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Understanding the impact of vehicular emissions on air pollution from the perspective of regional transport: A case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region in China

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Remote Sensing on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Power Plants and Urban Areas Based on DOAS Technology

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The prospected air quality measurements for further unconventional natural gas developments in China based on the United States experience

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huang, Y., Li, A., Wagner, T., Wang, Y., Hu, Z., Xie, P., … Dang, B. (2020). The quantification of NOxand SO2point source emission flux errors of mobile differential optical absorption spectroscopy on the basis of the Gaussian dispersion model: A simulation study. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 13(11), 6025–6051. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6025-2020

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 2

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Physics and Astronomy 1

25%

Arts and Humanities 1

25%

Engineering 1

25%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free