Self-Defense in International Law: Preemptive/Preventive Requisites

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter will investigate and assess the legal requisites of prevention and preemption, particularly in the context of the UN Charter’s Article 51 — ”the self-defense article.” As a foundational pillar for analyzing the specific preventive/preemptive strategies of both the Bush and Obama administrations’ use-of-force policies in the fight against global terrorism, the chapter will evaluate the extent to which such strategic options have been accepted more generally as justifiable measures of self-defense. Simply put, what was the standing of prevention and preemption under international law, and more specifically, their position under the UN Charter jus ad bellum regime before the inception of the Bush doctrine? In addressing this question, the chapter will evaluate the ongoing debate over the scope of self-defense permissible in international law and specifically the standing of the preventive and preemptive use-of-force in three interrelated sections.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Warren, A., & Bode, I. (2014). Self-Defense in International Law: Preemptive/Preventive Requisites. In New Security Challenges (pp. 23–45). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137411440_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free