Consent and public engagement in an era of expanded childhood immunisation

18Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Childhood immunisation programmes have seen well-heralded successes in disease control. An increasing number of scheduled vaccines, narrowing risk-benefit ratios and public attention to vaccine safety raise new questions about consent. We first explore the challenges that this highly dynamic environment poses for valid consent. Then, we broaden this discussion to wider public engagement by suggesting how the public - the bearers of vaccine risk and benefit - can be better involved in immunisation policy. © 2011 The Authors. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health.

References Powered by Scopus

Vaccination greatly reduces disease, disability, death and inequity worldwide

846Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Vaccine refusal, mandatory immunization, and the risks of vaccine-preventable diseases

771Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Do parents understand immunizations? A national telephone survey

419Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Vaccine hesitancy: An overview

1543Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Communicating with parents about vaccination: a framework for health professionals

497Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparative Safety of Vaccine Adjuvants: A Summary of Current Evidence and Future Needs

272Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leask, J., Braunack-Mayer, A., & Kerridge, I. (2011, September). Consent and public engagement in an era of expanded childhood immunisation. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2011.02160.x

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 26

70%

Researcher 9

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

3%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 20

59%

Social Sciences 7

21%

Arts and Humanities 4

12%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0