Three-dimensional evaluation of slow maxillary expansion with leaf expander vs. rapid maxillary expansion in a sample of growing patients: Direct effects on maxillary arch and spontaneous mandibular response

17Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim is to evaluate the effects of slow maxillary expansion on maxillary and mandibular arch, using a slow maxillary expander (SME-Leaf Expander) banded on primary second molar. Ninety patients with transverse maxillary deficiency and posterior crossbite were selected. Sixty-nine patients (33 males/36 females; 7.6 ± 1.7 years old) who underwent SME and 21 patients (10 males/ 11 females; 7.4 ± 1.2 years old) who were treated with rapid maxillary expander (RME). Digital models obtained pre-and post-treatment at appliance removal (9 to 11 months) were processed by means of a 3D scanner (Trios 3, 3Shape D250 laser, Copenhagen, Denmark). Interdental width in both maxilla and mandible were measured with 3 SHAPE Ortho Analyzer. Four Maxillary and four mandibular interdental width were traced and evaluated. The adequate Student's t-test (dependent or independent) was used to compare intra and intergroups interdental width differences (p < 0.05). The efficacy of the SME was confirmed both on maxillary and mandibular arch. All the maxillary and mandibular interdental widths increased significantly (p < 0.001). The comparison with the RME group showed significant statistical differences between the two treatments with a greater increase in primary first and second intermolar and canine width for the test group (p < 0.001). SME with Leaf Expander produced statistically significant effects for the correction of transverse maxillary deficiencies with a significant indirect effect on the mandibular arch.

References Powered by Scopus

The Cervical Vertebral Maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics

867Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dental and skeletal effects of palatal expansion techniques: a systematic review of the current evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses

96Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cone-beam computerized tomography evaluation of the maxillary dentoskeletal complex after rapid palatal expansion

88Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Comparison of Different Types of Palatal Expanders: Scoping Review

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparison of the dento-skeletal effects produced by Leaf expander versus rapid maxillary expander in prepubertal patients: a two-center randomized controlled trial

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

ZeroExpander: Metal-free automatic palatal expansion for special–needs patients

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cossellu, G., Ugolini, A., Beretta, M., Farronato, M., Gianolio, A., Maspero, C., & Lanteri, V. (2020). Three-dimensional evaluation of slow maxillary expansion with leaf expander vs. rapid maxillary expansion in a sample of growing patients: Direct effects on maxillary arch and spontaneous mandibular response. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 10(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10134512

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

63%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

13%

Researcher 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 8

80%

Design 1

10%

Chemistry 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0