Survey on WiFi-based indoor positioning techniques

222Citations
Citations of this article
153Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

With the rapid development of wireless communication technology, various indoor location-based services (ILBSs) have gradually penetrated into daily life. Although many other methods have been proposed to be applied to ILBS in the past decade, WiFi-based positioning techniques with a wide range of infrastructure have attracted attention in the field of wireless transmission. In this survey, the authors divide WiFi-based indoor positioning techniques into the active positioning technique and the passive positioning technique based on whether the target carries certain devices. After reviewing a large number of excellent papers in the related field, the authors make a detailed summary of these two types of positioning techniques. In addition, they also analyse the challenges and future development trends in the current technological environment.

References Powered by Scopus

CSI-Based Fingerprinting for Indoor Localization: A Deep Learning Approach

950Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

WiFi-based indoor positioning

633Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

SpotFi: Decimeter level localization using WiFi

542Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A Survey of Machine Learning for Indoor Positioning

193Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Machine Learning Based Indoor Localization Using Wi-Fi RSSI Fingerprints: An Overview

139Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Comprehensive Review of Indoor/Outdoor Localization Solutions in IoT era: Research Challenges and Future Perspectives

116Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, F., Liu, J., Yin, Y., Wang, W., Hu, D., Chen, P., & Niu, Q. (2020, June 2). Survey on WiFi-based indoor positioning techniques. IET Communications. Institution of Engineering and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-com.2019.1059

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 31

69%

Lecturer / Post doc 9

20%

Researcher 3

7%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 36

68%

Computer Science 14

26%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 2

4%

Physics and Astronomy 1

2%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free