Accuracy of Image-Based Automated Diagnosis in the Identification and Classification of Acute Burn Injuries. A Systematic Review

Abstract

Although they are a common type of injury worldwide, burns are challenging to diagnose, not least by untrained point-of-care clinicians. Given their visual nature, developments in artificial intelligence (AI) have sparked growing interest in the automated diagnosis of burns. This review aims to appraise the state of evidence thus far, with a focus on the identification and severity classification of acute burns. Three publicly available electronic databases were searched to identify peer-reviewed studies on the automated diagnosis of acute burns, published in English since 2005. From the 20 identified, three were excluded on the grounds that they concerned animals, older burns or lacked peer review. The remaining 17 studies, from nine different countries, were classified into three AI generations, considering the type of algorithms developed and the images used. Whereas the algorithms for burn identification have not gained much in accuracy across generations, those for severity classification improved substantially (from 66.2% to 96.4%), not least in the latest generation (n = 8). Those eight studies were further assessed for methodological bias and results applicability, using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. This highlighted the feasibility nature of the studies and their detrimental dependence on online databases of poorly documented images, at the expense of a substantial risk for patient selection and limited applicability in the clinical setting. In moving past the pilot stage, future development work would benefit from greater input from clinicians, who could contribute essential point-of-care knowledge and perspectives.