Nitrogen loss mitigation using duration-controlled grazing: Field observations compared to modelled outputs

  • Christensen C
  • Hedley M
  • Hanly J
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Dairy farmers in New Zealand are encouraged to adopt a range of management strategies, both well established and emerging, to reduce nitrogen (N) losses to waterways. In most regions the OVERSEER® nutrient budgeting software (Version 6) (hereafter referred to as Overseer) is the tool of choice in the assessment of N losses for both regulatory and monitoring purposes. As part of these processes, Overseer is used to assess the impact of improved farm practices on N leaching and runoff from individual farms. In a 3-year dairy system field trial at Massey University, N losses in leaching and runoff under duration-controlled grazing (DC; 4 hours per grazing) were compared with those under standard grazing (SG; 7 hours per day-grazing, 13 hours per night-grazing). A 36% reduction in total nitrogen (TN) losses under DC grazing was measured (14 kg TN/ha) relative to standard grazing (22 kg TN/ha). Farmers adopting DC grazing as a mitigation strategy will only be able to claim the reduction in TN losses estimated by Overseer, and thus observations from the field trial were compared with outputs from Overseer. There was good agreement between the Overseer predictions of N leaching and values measured at the trial site for both the SG and DC grazing treatments. A second Overseer simulation of a DC system suggests that while Overseer is able to predict the reductions in N leaching under DC grazing reasonably well, some issues such as runoff losses and storage of effluent need further consideration. Keywords: Duration-controlled grazing; OVERSEER®; N leaching

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Christensen, C. L., Hedley, M. J., Hanly, J. A., & Horne, D. J. (2012). Nitrogen loss mitigation using duration-controlled grazing: Field observations compared to modelled outputs. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association, 115–119. https://doi.org/10.33584/jnzg.2012.74.2893

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free