A Hemispherical Electrolyte Probe for Screening of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Cathode Materials

  • Duffy P
  • Barnett S
  • Mason T
0Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

© 2016 The Electrochemical Society.A hemispherical electrolyte probe (HEP) technique has been adapted and introduced as a method to rapidly characterize potential cathode materials for solid oxide fuel cells. The technique was used to measure the linear-specific triple phase boundary (TPB) resistance of electronic conductors La0.8Sr0.2MnO3 (LSM) and (La0.87Ca0.13)0.95MnO3 (LCM), along with the area-specific surface resistance of mixed ionic/electronic conductors (MIECs) Sr0.5Sm0.5CoO3-δ (SSC), and La0.6Sr0.4Fe0.8Co0.2O3-δ (LSFC). These parameters are measures of the catalytic performance of the cathode materials, independent of the electrode geometry. HEP-measured linear-specific TPB resistance and surface resistance values are consistently lower by a factor of ∼3 compared with literature values for these materials, while activation energies are in fair agreement with the literature values. The technique could be useful for comparative rapid screening of candidate cathode materials. Alternatively, good estimates of linear-specific TPB resistance or area-specific surface resistance values can be obtained using a HEP probe that has been calibrated with a known standard.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Schematic of the HEP geometry. An electrolyte probe comprised of a hemispherical section with radius r and a cylindrical section with length L is pressed into a flat electrode pellet, forming a contact with radius a.
  • Table I. Relative densities of the electrode pellets along with literature and experimental values for activation energies of ρT P B (LSM and LCM) or RS (SSC, LSFC).
  • Figure 2. (A) Idealized and (B) realistic contact between the hemispherical electrolyte probe and electrode pellet. The number, size, shape, and separation of the contact spots in the realistic contact depend on the preparation of the probe and pellet surfaces.
  • Figure 4. Nyquist plots of HEP measurements of LCM and LSFC using a YSZ probe. The smaller, high frequency arc was attributed to the electrolyte probe while the lower frequency arcs were attributed to the polarization resistance associated with the reaction at the TPB (LCM) or the electrode surface reaction (LSFC). The insets show the equivalent circuits used for fitting, and the numbers delineate decades in frequency.
  • Figure 3. Optical profilometry contour map of YSZ probe tip after tumble polishing. Significant pitting is visible on the surface, though the portions between the pits are relatively smooth.
  • Figure 5. Probe resistance for the HEP measurements. The dashed lines show values corresponding to various contact radii, with values listed in μm.
  • Table II. Physical properties used to predict contact area from the spring force. The LSFC stiffness was estimated from data on La0.8Sr0.2CoO3 (LSC), and the LSFC Poisson’s ratio was assumed to be similar to that of the YSZ.
  • Figure 7. Temperature dependence of the linear-specific TPB resistance. Closed symbols show the results of patterned electrode studies while the open symbols show the HEP results from this work. The HEP results for LSM and LCM underestimate ρT P B by a consistent factor of ∼3 and show similar activation energies.

References Powered by Scopus

Factors governing oxygen reduction in solid oxide fuel cell cathodes

2170Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cathode materials for solid oxide fuel cells: A review

1123Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Electrode kinetics of porous mixed-conducting oxygen electrodes

1099Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Duffy, P. K., Barnett, S. A., & Mason, T. O. (2016). A Hemispherical Electrolyte Probe for Screening of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Cathode Materials. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 163(8), F802–F807. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0341608jes

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘21‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

56%

Researcher 4

44%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 4

44%

Chemistry 3

33%

Materials Science 1

11%

Energy 1

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 51

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0