A COMPARISON STUDY FROM A CREATIVE THINKING PERSPECTIVE IN DIFFERENT DOMAINS AS ART EDUCATION AND NON-ART EDUCATION STUDENTS

3Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Creative thinking measurement for everyone in different domains is the most crucial critical subject. Therefore, the current discussion continues whether creativity in various fields different. This study aimed to measurement the students’ creative thinking scores in various domains disciplines to reveal differences. The main research question was as followed: Do whether students’ creative thinking scores of students in art and non-art education differ significantly? The method was a causal-comparative research design. Participant students (N = 456, meanage = 16–21) were equivalent regarding some variations; as education disciplines and ages. While however, the art and non-art education students were the domain-specific was art education students, the and domaingeneral, was non-art education students respectively. The present study determined a significant difference between domain-specific and domain-general on creative thinking scores in favor of the non-art education students in the range of ages 16 to 21. The study concluded that alternative instruments with domain-specific content needed to measure individuals’ creative thinking in the domain-specific. This study suggested future research to conduct creativity measurement comparatively individuals in different age ranges and domains fields.

References Powered by Scopus

Can we trust creativity tests? A review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT)

500Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Creativity Crisis: The Decrease in Creative Thinking Scores on the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking

430Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Scoring divergent thinking tests: A review and systematic framework

284Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Neurocognitive Profile of Creativity in Improving Academic Performance—A Scoping Review

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The role of the history of art of Kazakhstan and its artistic trends in the students’ educational process

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ulger, K. (2023). A COMPARISON STUDY FROM A CREATIVE THINKING PERSPECTIVE IN DIFFERENT DOMAINS AS ART EDUCATION AND NON-ART EDUCATION STUDENTS. Creativity Studies, 16(1), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2023.14593

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 2

67%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 2

40%

Arts and Humanities 2

40%

Social Sciences 1

20%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free