Absenteeism in the workplace: Results from Danish sample survey data

16Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Absentee data is analyzed using a worker environmental survey carried out in 1995. In a model which distinguishes between discretionary and involuntary absences individuals are assumed to maximize expected utility. This generates a probability distribution of days absent per year which is a mixture of two negative binomial distributions representing the behaviour of two unknown types of agent. This distribution is estimated separately for men and women. For each gender the number of days absent is quite small relative to what researchers have found in other countries. In the empirical model we identify different effects of the explanatory variables for workers with low rates of absenteeism and workers with high rates of absenteeism. © Springer-Verlag 2006.

References Powered by Scopus

Specification and testing of some modified count data models

1314Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Major influences on employee attendance: A process model

466Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Demand for medical care by the elderly: A finite mixture approach

321Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

New evidence on absenteeism and presenteeism

69Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The gender gap in sickness absence: Long-term trends in eight European countries

43Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Obesity, diet quality and absenteeism in a working population

34Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jensen, S., & McIntosh, J. (2007). Absenteeism in the workplace: Results from Danish sample survey data. Empirical Economics, 32(1), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-006-0075-4

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

68%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

13%

Researcher 4

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 20

59%

Social Sciences 5

15%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5

15%

Psychology 4

12%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free