Prognostic Impact of Multiple Drug Use at Discharge in Patients Hospitalized with Heart Failure

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The association between polypharmacy/multiple drug use (MDU) and prognosis in patients hospitalized with heart failure (HF) is unclear. It is also unknown whether the prognostic values of MDU vary depending on the presence/absence of a previous history of HF and preserved/reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We analyzed consecutive 1,034 patients hospitalized with HF (age, 74.9 ± 11.5 years; 58.7% male). MDU was defined as 5 drugs at discharge. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death and HF readmission. MDU was observed in 695 patients (67.2%). Patients with MDU use had higher prevalences of a previous history of HF, reduced LVEF, and comorbidities than those without MDU. Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that MDU was significantly associated with the primary endpoint after adjustment for possible confounders (hazard ratio [HR], 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.79; P = 0.030). There was significant interaction between the presence/absence of a history of HF and the prognostic impact of MDU (HF history [-]: HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.54-1.40; P = 0.553; HF history [+]: HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.16-2.55; P = 0.007; P for interaction = 0.005). However, there was no significant interaction between preserved/reduced LVEF and the prognostic impact of MDU (P for interaction = 0.274). In conclusion, MDU at discharge is an independent risk factor for the composite of death or HF readmission in patients hospitalized with HF. We observed a significant interaction between the presence of de novo versus recurrent HF and the prognostic value of MDU.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maeda, D., Kanzaki, Y., Sakane, K., Tsuda, K., Akamatsu, K., Hourai, R., … Hoshiga, M. (2023). Prognostic Impact of Multiple Drug Use at Discharge in Patients Hospitalized with Heart Failure. International Heart Journal, 64(3), 394–399. https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.22-503

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free