Análise de custo-efetividade de métodos preventivos para superfície oclusal de acordo com o risco de cárie: Resultados de um ensaio clínico controlado

5Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study presents the results of a cost-effectiveness analysis in a controlled clinical trial on the effectiveness of a modified glass ionomer resin sealant (Vitremer, 3M ESPE) and the application of fluoride varnish (Duraphat, Colgate) on occlusal surfaces of first permanent molars in children 6-8 years of age (N = 268), according to caries risk (high versus low). Children were examined semiannually by the same calibrated dentist for 24 months after allocation in six groups: high and low risk controls (oral health education every three months); high and low risk with varnish (oral health education every three months + varnish biannually); and high and low risk with sealant (oral health education every three months + a single application of sealant). Economic analysis showed that sealing permanent first molars of high-risk schoolchildren showed a C/E ratio of US$ 119.80 per saved occlusal surface and an incremental C/E ratio of US$ 108.36 per additional saved occlusal surface. The study concluded that sealing permanent first molars of high-risk schoolchildren was the most cost-effective intervention.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tagliaferro, E. P. da S., Marinho, D. S., Pereira, C. C. de A., Pardi, V., Ambrosano, G. M. B., Meneghim, M. de C., & Pereira, A. C. (2013). Análise de custo-efetividade de métodos preventivos para superfície oclusal de acordo com o risco de cárie: Resultados de um ensaio clínico controlado. Cadernos de Saude Publica, 29(SUPPL.1). https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00021613

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free