Cesarean section in the People's Republic of China: Current perspectives

57Citations
Citations of this article
102Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To review the current knowledge on the prevalence, reasons, and consequences of cesarean sections in the People's Republic of China. Methods: Peer-reviewed articles were systematically searched on PubMed. The following Chinese databases were comprehensively searched: the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and the VIP information. The databases were searched from inception to September 1, 2013. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts for eligibility. Full texts of eligible papers were reviewed, where relevant references were hand-searched and reviewed. Findings: Sixty articles were included from PubMed, 17 articles were intentionally picked out from Chinese journals, and five additional articles were added, for a total of 82 articles for the analysis. With a current national rate near 40%, the literature consistently reported a rapid rise of cesarean sections in the People's Republic of China in the past decades, irrespective of where people lived or their socioeconomic standing. Nonclinical factors were considered as the main drivers fueling the rise of cesareans in the People's Republic of China. There was a lively debate on whether women's preferences or providers' distorted financial incentives affected the rise in cesarean sections. However, recent evidence suggests that it might be the People's Republic of China's health development approach - focusing on specialized care and marginalizing primary care - that is playing a role. Although 30 articles were identified studying the consequences of cesareans, the methodologies are in general weak and the themes are out of focus. Conclusion: The overuse of cesareans is rising alarmingly in the People's Republic of China and has become a real public health problem. No consensus has been made on the leverage factors that drive the cesarean epidemic, particularly for those nonclinical factors. The more macro level structural factors may have played a part, though further research is warranted to understand the mechanisms. Knowledge of the consequences of cesareans, particularly for women, is limited in the People's Republic of China, leaving a substantial literature gap. © 2014 Feng et al.

References Powered by Scopus

Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08

783Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rates of caesarean section: Analysis of global, regional and national estimates

749Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: Multicentre prospective study

531Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide

795Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Lancet Commission on 70 years of women's reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health in China

372Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development

202Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Feng, X. L., Wang, Y., An, L., & Ronsmans, C. (2014). Cesarean section in the People’s Republic of China: Current perspectives. International Journal of Women’s Health. Dove Medical Press Ltd. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S41410

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 24

45%

Researcher 21

40%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 32

65%

Nursing and Health Professions 9

18%

Social Sciences 5

10%

Computer Science 3

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 51

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0