A Genuine Win-Win: Resolving the “Conserve or Catch” Conflict in Marine Reserve Network Design

19Citations
Citations of this article
96Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To support fishing communities, reserves should ensure the persistence of meta-populations while boosting fisheries yield. However, so far their design from the onset has rarely considered both objectives simultaneously. Here we overcome this barrier in designing a network of reserves for the Caribbean spiny lobster, a species with long larval duration for which local management is considered pointless because the benefits of protection are believed to be accrued elsewhere. Our reserve design approach uses spatially explicit population models and considers ontogenetic migration, larval and adult movement. We show that yield and persistence are negatively related, but that both objectives can be maximized simultaneously during planning. Importantly, we also show that local efforts to manage spiny lobster, the most economically valuable marine resource in the Caribbean, can result in locally accrued benefits, overcoming a major barrier to investing effort in the appropriate management of this species.

References Powered by Scopus

Effects of marine reserves on adjacent fisheries

780Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management

712Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Implications of fish home range size and relocation for marine reserve function

523Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chollett, I., Garavelli, L., O’Farrell, S., Cherubin, L., Matthews, T. R., Mumby, P. J., & Box, S. J. (2017, September 1). A Genuine Win-Win: Resolving the “Conserve or Catch” Conflict in Marine Reserve Network Design. Conservation Letters. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12318

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 38

56%

Researcher 24

35%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 35

52%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27

40%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

4%

Social Sciences 2

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free