Estimating Grouped Data Models with a Binary-Dependent Variable and Fixed Eects via a Logit versus a Linear Probability Model: The Impact of Dropped Units

1Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This letter deals with a very simple question: if we have grouped data with a binary-dependent variable and want to include fixed eects in the specification, canwemeaningfully compare results using a linear model to those estimated with a logit? The reason to doubt such a comparison is that the linear specification appears to keep all observations, whereas the logit drops the groups where the dependent variable is either all zeros or all ones. This letter demonstrates that a linear specification averages the estimates for all the homogeneous outcome groups (which, by definition, all have slope coeicients of zero) with the slope coeicients for the groups with a mix of zeros and ones. The correct comparison of the linear to logit formis to only look at groups with some variation in the dependent variable. Researchers using the linear specification are urged to report results for all groups and for the subset of groups where the dependent variable varies. The interpretation of the dierence between these two results depends upon assumptions which cannot be empirically assessed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beck, N. (2019). Estimating Grouped Data Models with a Binary-Dependent Variable and Fixed Eects via a Logit versus a Linear Probability Model: The Impact of Dropped Units. Public Health Nutrition, 22(18), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2019.20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free