Nation-building, gender and politics in Kazakhstan: The case of the golden man

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In 1969, 60 km from Alma-Ata, the capital of the Soviet Socialist Republic of Kazakhstan, archaeologists excavated a funerary structure of the kurgan type, an outfit enveloping a skeleton dating from the 5th or 4th century BC. Richly decorated with more than 4,000 pieces of gold, the remains were dubbed "Golden Man". Believed to be a young Scythian-Saka prince, it soon became one of the most important symbols of a nascent Kazakh nationality. However, subsequent research carried out since the late 1990s, suggest that the "Golden Man" was in fact a "Golden Woman". The ensuing debate has had an evident impact on the reformulation of the representations of Kazakh national identity. In this article, I will reflect on the relationship between nation-building, gender and the political role of archaeology/anthropology, from the standpoint of a Brazilian anthropologist-cum-tourist who visited Kazakhstan in December 2017.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gontijo, F. (2018). Nation-building, gender and politics in Kazakhstan: The case of the golden man. Mana: Estudos de Antropologia Social, 24(3), 151–185. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-49442018v24n3p151

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free