Biomechanical effect of PEEK rod vs. metallic rod in spinal fusion constructs

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this study we conducted a finite element analysis to investigate changes in load-sharing characteristics and the screw-bone loading of a PEEK rod system compared to a traditional titanium rod system when used as posterior instrumentation in conjunction with an interbody fusion. A 400N follower load, 14o Flexion, 8o extension was applied to an L1-S1 FE-model with fusion at L4-L5. Under compression, the load sharing between the anterior column support and posterior instrumentation is 70%-30% for the titanium rod and 85%-15% for the PEEK rod. The screw-bone loading for the PEEK rod is reduced by 85% and 71% in flexion and extension respectively when compared to a titanium rod. © 2010 International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moumene, M., Harms, J., Geisler, F., & Vaccaro, A. (2010). Biomechanical effect of PEEK rod vs. metallic rod in spinal fusion constructs. In IFMBE Proceedings (Vol. 31 IFMBE, pp. 577–579). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14515-5_147

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free