Narrativas, processos reflexivos e prática profissional: Apontamentos para pesquisa e formação

5Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study offers methodological contributions for research and educational projects involving the use of narratives and reflective processes. Based on a study on professional practice, written narratives from clinical sessions within Occupational Therapy were analyzed using the categories proposed by Hatton and Smith (1995), to show the process of reflecting on actions: descriptive narration, reflective description, dialog reflection and critical reflection. The results presented in this paper relate to the details involved in putting this methodology into operation, especially regarding the format (grammatical structure) and the content (manifested reflection) of each category. In this respect, it was sought to complement the work of Hatton and Smith, through providing better systematization for using these categories.

References Powered by Scopus

Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation

1279Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking

931Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Group chronicle: A tool for collaborative analysis and improvement of reflection on action research

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Occupational therapy and social education: a four-decade follow-up of the institutional trajectory of adolescents and young people

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Let's think about practice? The applicability of a reflective tool to support professional reasoning in occupational therapy

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marcolino, T. Q., & Mizukami, M. D. G. N. (2008). Narrativas, processos reflexivos e prática profissional: Apontamentos para pesquisa e formação. Interface: Communication, Health, Education, 12(26), 541–547. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-32832008000300007

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

60%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

20%

Researcher 3

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 6

55%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

18%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

18%

Design 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free