Logicism, Intuitionism, and Formalism

  • Sinaceur H
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The period in the foundations of mathematics that started in 1879 with the publication of "Frege's Begriffsschrift" and ended in 1931 with Godel's Auber formal unentscheidbare Satze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme, I can reasonably be called the classical period. It saw the development of three major foundational programmes: the logicism of Frege, Russell and Whitehead, the intuitionism of Brouwer, and Hilbert's formalist and proof-theoretic programme. In this period, there were also lively exchanges between the various schools culminating in the famous Hilbert-Brouwer controversy in the 1920s. The purpose of this anthology is to review the programmes in the foundations of mathematics from the classical period and to assess their possible relevance for contemporary philosophy of mathematics. What can we say, in retrospect, about the various foundational programmes of the classical period and the disputes that took place between them? To what extent do the classical programmes of logicism, intuitionism and formalism represent options that are still alive today? These questions are addressed in this volume by leading mathematical logicians and philosophers of mathematics. A special section is concerned with constructive mathematics and its foundations. This active branch of mathematics is a direct legacy of Brouwer's intuitionism. Today one often views it more abstractly as mathematics based on intuitionistic logic. It can then be regarded as a generalisation of classical mathematics in that it may be given, firstly, the standard set-theoretic interpretation, secondly, algorithmic meaning, and thirdly, nonstandard interpretations in terms of variable sets (sheaves over topological spaces). The volume will be of interest primarily to researchers and graduate students of philosophy, logic, mathematics and theoretical computer science. The material will be accessible to specialists in these areas and to advanced graduate students in the respective fields.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sinaceur, H. B. (2009). Logicism, Intuitionism, and Formalism. (S. Lindström, E. Palmgren, K. Segerberg, & V. Stoltenberg-Hansen, Eds.) (pp. 357–396). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8926-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free