Mouse oocytes carrying metacentric Robertsonian chromosomes have fewer crossover sites and higher aneuploidy rates than oocytes carrying acrocentric chromosomes alone

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Meiotic homologous recombination during fetal development dictates proper chromosome segregation in adult mammalian oocytes. Successful homologous synapsis and recombination during Meiotic Prophase I (MPI) depends on telomere-led chromosome movement along the nuclear envelope. In mice, all chromosomes are acrocentric, while other mammalian species carry a mixture of acrocentric and metacentric chromosomes. Such differences in telomeric structures may explain the exceptionally low aneuploidy rates in mice. Here, we tested whether the presence of metacentric chromosomes carrying Robertsonian translocations (RbT) affects the rate of homologous recombination or aneuploidy. We found a delay in MPI progression in RbT-carrier vs. wild-type (WT) fetal ovaries. Furthermore, resolution of distal telomere clusters, associated with synapsis initiation, was delayed and centromeric telomere clusters persisted until later MPI substages in RbT-carrier oocytes compared to WT oocytes. When chromosomes fully synapsed, higher percentages of RbT-carrier oocytes harbored at least one chromosome pair lacking MLH1 foci, which indicate crossover sites, compared to WT oocytes. Aneuploidy rates in ovulated eggs were also higher in RbT-carrier females than in WT females. In conclusion, the presence of metacentric chromosomes among acrocentric chromosomes in mouse oocytes delays MPI progression and reduces the efficiency of homologous crossover, resulting in a higher frequency of aneuploidy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kazemi, P., & Taketo, T. (2022). Mouse oocytes carrying metacentric Robertsonian chromosomes have fewer crossover sites and higher aneuploidy rates than oocytes carrying acrocentric chromosomes alone. Scientific Reports, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16175-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free