Moral Filth and the Sinning Body: Hell, Purgatory, Resurrection

  • Morrison S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

As famously attributed to Augustine, we are born between urine and feces (“inter faeces et urinam nascimur”).1 The mingled sexual and excretory organs necessitate secrecy. We feel nausea for “both kinds of ‘filth.’ We cannot even know if excrement smells bad because of our disgust for it, or if its bad smell is what causes that disgust.”2 At the same time, the entanglement of these functions makes desire an integral element in filth production. Desire—for erotic or excremental fulfillment—must be disciplined. By analogizing sin—particularly sexually related sins—with filth, the Church Fathers attempted to control and shame the individual into socially constructive behavior. Our bodies are cause enough for us to be disgusted with ourselves. Excrement became a means to control the body and to punish the soul.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morrison, S. S. (2008). Moral Filth and the Sinning Body: Hell, Purgatory, Resurrection. In Excrement in the Late Middle Ages (pp. 25–44). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230615021_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free