Meta-analysis of Polymyxin Use in Patients

1Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this chapter, we systematically reviewed studies that assessed polymyxin’s effectiveness and summarized results through meta-analysis. The outcomes addressed were all-cause mortality, assuming that for patients with severe multidrug-resistant infections survival is the most important outcome, and resistance development, important for future patients. Most clinical data on polymyxins in the literature are from retrospective, observational studies at high risk of bias. The majority of clinical studies were unpowered to examine mortality controlling for other risk factors. The studies had no control of dosage regimens and treatment modifications. We identified several areas of missing data, in particular randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, different dosage regimens, polymyxins versus alternative antibiotics (e.g. aminoglycosides, tigecycline), and monotherapy versus specific combination therapies. Ideally, mortality and development of resistance should be examined in RCTs, with further longitudinal studies required for the latter.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Paul, M., Zusman, O., & Leibovici, L. (2019). Meta-analysis of Polymyxin Use in Patients. In Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology (Vol. 1145, pp. 143–153). Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16373-0_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free