Effect of sugar replacement with stevianna and inulin on the texture and predictive glycaemic response of muffins

94Citations
Citations of this article
196Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The application of sugar replacers used in bakery products is of growing interest to the food industry, as it provides the possibility of delivering products with reduced energy and sugar. The aim of this study was to investigate the textural properties and glycaemic responses of muffins made using stevianna and inulin. Two levels of sugar replacer were used (50% and 100%). Total replacement of sucrose gave muffins with a firmer texture than the control (P < 0.05); 50% replacement, however, gave a similar texture to control. The predicted glycaemic response was reduced in sugar-replaced muffins compared to control samples. In particular, the replacement of sucrose with 100% stevianna caused a significant decrease in the standardised area under the curve values. Therefore, there exists the potential to regulate the glycaemic response of muffins by the incorporation of 50% stevianna or 50% inulin without affecting their textural properties.

References Powered by Scopus

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Get full text

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gao, J., Brennan, M. A., Mason, S. L., & Brennan, C. S. (2016). Effect of sugar replacement with stevianna and inulin on the texture and predictive glycaemic response of muffins. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 51(9), 1979–1987. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.13143

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 52

63%

Researcher 15

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59

69%

Engineering 14

16%

Nursing and Health Professions 7

8%

Chemistry 6

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 5

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0