Variations in Penile Anatomy and Their Contribution to Medical Mischief

  • McGrath K
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

It is clear that the human penis is as individual as a fingerprint, so that no two are alike. Some of the variations have been used as justifications for circumcision, but are they common or genuinely pathological? And can the modern standardized methods (“one size fits all”) provide a predictable result in the face of such variation or any therapeutic value? Three of these variations will be reviewed for their nature and significance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McGrath, K. (2008). Variations in Penile Anatomy and Their Contribution to Medical Mischief. In Circumcision and Human Rights (pp. 97–108). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9167-4_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free