Prediction intervals for random-effects meta-analysis: A confidence distribution approach

59Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Prediction intervals are commonly used in meta-analysis with random-effects models. One widely used method, the Higgins–Thompson–Spiegelhalter prediction interval, replaces the heterogeneity parameter with its point estimate, but its validity strongly depends on a large sample approximation. This is a weakness in meta-analyses with few studies. We propose an alternative based on bootstrap and show by simulations that its coverage is close to the nominal level, unlike the Higgins–Thompson–Spiegelhalter method and its extensions. The proposed method was applied in three meta-analyses.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nagashima, K., Noma, H., & Furukawa, T. A. (2019). Prediction intervals for random-effects meta-analysis: A confidence distribution approach. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 28(6), 1689–1702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280218773520

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free