Applicable statutes give Nigerian courts discretion to achieve fairness in marital property readjustment. Ironically, the courts' approach has often been to adjudicate on the basis of formal title, resulting in a general failure to make any readjustments. This article offers two alternative explanations for this judicial behaviour: Absence of a specific statutory marriage-centred definition of matrimonial property; and the courts' failure to appreciate the implicit matrimonial property regime revealed by a perspicacious interpretation of the statutes. These factors lead the courts to exercise a title-finding jurisdiction instead of an adjustive one. This conservative approach results in the courts exercising an exclusionary prescription of property. These flaws ignore the socio-cultural underpinnings and environment of marriage that support patriarchy in Africa and generally disable women in relation to property rights. Sample court cases support this thesis and underscore the need for a statutory definition of matrimonial property, with marriage as its denominator.
CITATION STYLE
Attah, M. (2018). Divorcing Marriage from Marital Assets: Why Equity and Women Fail in Property Readjustment Actions in Nigeria. Journal of African Law, 62(3), 427–446. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855318000207
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.